EPA finalizes napier grass, giant reed RFS pathways

By Erin Voegele | July 02, 2013

The U.S. EPA has issued a supplemental final rule under the renewable fuel standard (RFS) pertaining to biofuels made from giant reed and napier grass feedstock, effective June. 28. The rule contains a lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis of biofuels made from these feedstocks, along with a final regulatory determination that such fuels qualify as cellulosic under the RFS. The rule also addresses concerns over the invasive potential of the feedstocks through a system of registration, recordkeeping and reporting requirements. 

The rulemaking process that was finalized June 28 has been ongoing since January 2012, when the EPA published a direct final rule and parallel proposed rule under the RFS. 

Those rulemaking actions included pathways for four biofuel feedstocks, including giant reed, napier grass, energy cane and camelina oil. After receiving adverse comments on the portion of the direct final rule pertaining to giant reed and napier grass, the EPA withdrew the direct final rule. Several provisions of the parallel proposed rule were finalized this year, in early March. However, that final rulemaking did not take action on giant reed or napier grass. 

The newly issued supplemental final rule includes the EPA’s determination that biofuel made from giant reed and napier grass meets the 60 percent GHG reduction threshold, qualifying it as a cellulosic fuel. 

In response to comments regarding concern over the invasive risk of these plant species, the rulemaking also includes requirements aimed at minimizing invasiveness risk. Biofuel producers utilizing the feedstocks will be required to demonstrate that growth of giant reed or napier grass will not pose a significantly likelihood of spreading beyond the planted area, or that the invasive risks are being managed and minimized through an EPA-approved Risk Mitigation Plan. The plan is to include means for early detection and rapid response to potential spread. It must also include best management practices, continuous monitoring and reporting of site conditions, and a plan for site closure, along with post-closure monitoring. A third-party auditor is also required evaluate the RMP annually.  

A full copy of the rule is available here


2 Responses

  1. Gary C. Wobler



    How does napier grass and sea weed stack-up against other forms of energy when it comes BTu value

  2. Richard Rodriguez CPA



    Reply to your question is to voluminous to answer but here is some info for starters. I am a self educated biomass investor. Review these as I contend the greatest yield per acre lies in Giant King Grass but reply to my email for further discussion. Although Giant King Grass is not suited for cold frost weather in the tropical climate it is most ideal.


    Leave a Reply

    Biomass Magazine encourages encourages civil conversation and debate. However, we reserve the right to delete comments for reasons including but not limited to: any type of attack, injurious statements, profanity, business solicitations or other advertising.

    Comments are closed