Today, there’s room for all energy sources—no one should be forced out. But if we’re serious about cutting carbon without risking grid stability or financial disaster, biomass and coal need to work together, and that’s where blending comes in.I’ve spent my career in coal mining, field sampling and industrial consulting. I love premium metallurgical coal; it’s like magic for steelmaking and specialty markets. But I’ve also developed a deep passion for biomass and believe it’s one of the smartest tools we have for balancing sustainability with practicality in today’s energy world.Blending biomass with coal isn’t technically possible—it’s a craft. And it’s the practical bridge we need between today’s realities and tomorrow’s carbon goals.The Case for Blending&nbsp; Some insist coal should disappear overnight. Others say biomass is too expensive or unreliable. The truth often lies somewhere in the middle. Blending offers the following powerful advantages:• &nbsp;Lower carbon emissions: Even a 5%-10% biomass blend can meaningfully reduce a plant’s carbon footprint—helping utilities meet regulatory targets and sustainability goals.• Economic flexibility: Relying solely on coal or biomass can be risky. Blending allows operators to adjust ratios based on market prices and local supply availability.• Grid reliability: Unlike solar or wind, biomass is dispatchable. Blending keeps boilers running consistently while still contributing to emissions reductions.Technical Challenges: Real, but Manageable&nbsp; Cofiring isn’t as simple as tossing two fuels into a hopper. &nbsp;Real-world challenges include:• Moisture content: Biomass is often wetter than coal, requiring drying and combustion management.• Ash chemistry: Biomass ash can be higher in alkalis, leading to slagging or corrosion if not handled properly.• Dust hazards: Biomass dust is more explosive than coal dust, demanding updated safety protocols.• Supply chain variability: Pellet markets can fluctuate rapidly, and regional feedstock availability may be seasonal.None of the above challenges are deal-breakers; rather, they’re operational factors that can be managed with smart planning and proactive quality assurance.Germany’s aggressive renewable push included rapid coal phase-outs. The result? High prices, grid instability and even biomass plants struggling to source consistent feedstock. From that, we’ve learned that an all-or-nothing approach isn’t feasible. Instead, a stepwise blending strategy is the smarter approach—it reduces risk, protects budgets and ensures long-term sustainability.Why Blending Matters Beyond Emissions&nbsp; From a plant operator’s perspective, blending biomass with coal is not only an emissions strategy, but also a way to strengthen resilience. Fuel diversity lowers exposure to single-market shocks, whether from coal pricing swings or biomass supply disruptions. Blending also provides a practical bridge for communities that depend on coal jobs and tax revenue, offering a path to decarbonization without sudden closures. Even a modest blend can demonstrate real-world progress, help meet interim climate commitments, and create space for larger transitions down the road. Importantly, success depends on viewing coal and biomass as complementary rather than competitive. By using the infrastructure we already have, we can align environmental benefits with economic continuity—avoiding the false choice between energy security and sustainability.The Role of Sampling and Fuel Quality Control&nbsp; Blending only works when you know your fuel. Moisture, Btu, ash content and chemistry, combustible dust hazards and contaminants like chlorine, sodium and phosphorus—that’s where sampling and lab testing come in. Sampling and analysis shouldn’t be an afterthought. Without good data, blending becomes guesswork, and that’s where the risk lives. I recommend the following:&nbsp;• Start with 5%–10% biomass.• Monitor quality with consistent lab testing.• Train operators on safe, efficient handling.• Adjust blending ratios based on markets and availability.We don’t have to achieve carbon neutrality overnight—but we can start making real progress today. There’s room for all energy sources. Blending is a craft, and it can be mastered. So, let’s keep the lights on, the carbon down and the economics practical—one smart blend at a time. Author: JW Dye&nbsp; Founder &amp; Managing Director&nbsp; Clear Creek Advisory &amp; Field Services LLC&nbsp; jw@clearcreeksampling.com&nbsp; 304-960‑0646

2025-10-02 - Blending Biomass with Coal: A Practical Path (Biomass Magazine)

small_JW-DYE-2.jpg

thumbnail_JW-DYE-2.jpg

JW-DYE-2.jpg

Blending biomass with coal isn’t technically possible—it’s a craft. 

Blending Biomass with Coal: A Practical Path

Related Stories

XCF confirms plans for SAF capacity expansion in Nevada, additional SAF projects in Florida and North Carolina

Tidewater Renewables: Q3 output impacted by plant downtime, plans for SAF capacity continue to advance

UK: Electricity production from plant biomass, including wood pellets, up slightly in Q2

EIA predicts increased woody biomass consumption for 2025, 2026

LanzaJet announces Freedom Pines Fuels facility has fully operated, produced fuels

Upcoming Events

2026 International Biomass Conference & Expo

Blending Biomass with Coal: A Practical Path.css-7jxktu{position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;right:0px;height:3px;border-radius:3px;background-color:var(--chakra-colors-brandBlack);}