The U.S. EPA on Oct. 21 delivered its final rule that is expected to change how the agency considers the costs and benefits of regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act to the White House Office of Management and Budget. OMB review marks a final stage before a final rule is released publicly.
The EPA on June 4 <a href="http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/17120/epa-to-change-how-it-considers-costs-benefits-of-caa-regulations" target="_blank">issued a proposed rule</a> that aims to require all future significant regulations promulgated under the CAA to be accompanied by a benefit-cost analysis (BCA). The Renewable Fuel Standard is among the CAA programs that will likely be affected.
The proposed rule follows an&nbsp;<a href="http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/15354/epa-to-change-how-it-considers-costs-benefits-of-regulations" target="_blank">advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) issued in June 2018</a>&nbsp;in which the EPA said it was soliciting public input on whether and how to change the way it considers costs and benefits when making regulatory decisions. The ANPR was related to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/03/01/2017-04107/enforcing-the-regulatory-reform-agenda" target="_blank">Executive Order 13777</a>, which was issued by President Trump in February 2017 and directed federal agencies to &ldquo;alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens placed on the American people.&rdquo;
Roughly one year later, on May 13, 2019, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler issued a memorandum saying &ldquo;the agency should ensure that its regulatory decisions are rooted in sound, transparent and consistent approaches to evaluating benefits and costs.&rdquo; He said many EPA statutes consider benefits and costs as part of regulatory decision-making, but noted benefits and costs have historically been treated differently depending on the media office and underlying authority. &ldquo;This has resulted in various concepts of benefits, costs and other factors that may be considered,&rdquo; he continued. &ldquo;This memorandum will initiate an effort to rectify these inconsistencies through statute-specific actions.&rdquo;
The memo references the ANPR and indicates &ldquo;a large cross-section of stakeholders identified instances when the agency underestimated costs, overestimated benefits or evaluated benefits and costs inconsistently.&rdquo; Within the memo, Wheeler wrote, &ldquo;Per the executive order and based on these public comments, the EPA decided to take further action to evaluate opportunities for reform.&rdquo;
The proposed rule issued June 4 further builds on those efforts. A fact sheet released by the agency says the proposed regulation contains three main requirements. Under the first, the EPA would prepare a BCA for all future significant proposed and final regulations under the CAA. Significant regulations are expected to include those with the largest annual impact on the economy; those that would disproportionately affect an industry, group or areas; or those that are novel or relevant for other policy reasons.
Second, the proposal states the BCA should be developed in accordance with best practices from the economic, engineering, physical and biological sciences. The proposal outlines required elements of BCA&rsquo;s following established protocols for conducting best cost analyses published by the White House Office of Management and Budget and further elaborated in EPA&rsquo;s &ldquo;Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses.&rdquo; The EPA said these include addresses all key elements of a benefit-cost analysis and&mdash;to the extent permitted by law&mdash;making underlying data available to the public.
Third, the EPA must increase transparency in the presentation of the benefits resulting from significant CAA regulations. The agency said in addition to a clear reporting of the overall results of the BCA, EPA proposes to require a summary presentation of the overall BCAs result in the rule, including total costs, benefits and net benefits. EPA also said it is proposing to require a separate reporting of the public health and welfare benefits that are specific to the objective of the CAA provision under which the rule is promulgated.
A public comment period on the proposed rule was open through Aug. 3. According to information posted to the Regulations.gov website, 24,720 public comments were filed regarding the proposed rule.
Information posted to the OMB website indicates the final rule is expected to be issued in November 2020.
&nbsp;

2020/10/omb-logo_16034029474974_largethumb.jpg

2020/10/omb-logo_16034029474974_thumb.jpg

2020/10/omb-logo_16034029474974.jpg

The U.S. EPA on Oct. 21 delivered its final rule that is expected to change how the agency considers the costs and benefits of regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act to the White House Office of Management and Budget. 

EPA delivers final rule on cost, benefits of CAA regs to OMB

Related Stories

EverGen Infrastructure: New 20-year offtake agreement with FortisBC Energy now in effect

CHAR Tech Receives C$10 million commitment from BMI for Espanola biocarbon project

Lane County and Emerald People’s Utility District select Waga Energy to upgrade landfill gas to RNG in Oregon

EPA: 23.25 billion RINs generated in 2025

Environmental groups ask USDA to make manure digester projects ineligible for REAP

Upcoming Events

2026 International Biomass Conference & Expo

EPA delivers final rule on cost, benefits of CAA regs to OMB.css-7jxktu{position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;right:0px;height:3px;border-radius:3px;background-color:var(--chakra-colors-brandBlack);}