In mid-September, the Pellet Fuels Institute attended a House Energy Subcommittee meeting titled “Energy Subcommittee: Appliance and Building Policies: Restoring the American Dream of Homeownership and Consumer Choice.” The meeting promised to examine several pieces of introduced legislation that all sought to reverse, halt or slow state and federal regulation that peered into American homes and dictated the kinds of dishwashers, showerheads, and even heating and cooking fuels that consumers could purchase, install and use.Regrettably, the hearing devolved into partisan mudslinging, with Democratic members of the committee taking shots at Jeff Novak, the U.S. Department of Energy’s acting general counsel, who did little more than offer to take the question “on the record, officially,” whatever that might mean.It was evident early in the hearing that that there would be little to no substantive debate around the issue of how the everyday energy needs of Americans would be met. It made more sense, then, to listen for any areas of common ground. Fortunately, one emerged early in the hearing. As they made their arguments, committee members from both parties pointed to the exploding demand for electric power created by the meteoric growth of artificial intelligence, data center servers and processors—and for good reason. While studies vary in their projections of exactly how much new power will be needed, even the conservative estimates place the figure at tens of gigawatts, with aggressive estimates approaching the hundreds of gigawatts. Current U.S. electric generation capacity is about 1,200 gigawatts, so the aggressive estimates suggest the U.S. may need to grow its generation capacity by nearly 10% to meet this new demand source. The country has not seen a new demand center of this magnitude emerge since modern air conditioning.For Democrats on the committee, this underscored the need for increasingly efficient appliance standards, and they railed at the Trump administration for gutting the federal programs that supported consumer purchases of such appliances, including the 25C tax provisions for more efficient furnaces, better doors and windows, and qualifying wood and wood pellet appliances. The Republicans on the committee countered and pointed to the lunacy of state policies—such as New York’s natural gas ban—that will effectively mandate the electrification of new construction home heating and cooking in the state by 2026. The last thing the grid needs in the era of AI, they offered, is to suddenly be expected to meet home heating and cooking needs, too.Interestingly, there was zero discussion about whether this headfirst leap into the energy-ravenous technology that is AI was worth the societal cost. It’s a strange thing to watch policymakers debate whether a closet lightbulb should be incandescent or fluorescent while offering no guidance on a new demand source that will require U.S. power generation to grow by as much as 10%.Where, then, does all of this leave wood pellet heating? Estimates put the percentage of American homes that use wood or wood pellets at just 2%. For context, nearly half of all American homes use natural gas as a heating fuel. As the AI leviathan grows along with its insatiable appetite for more electrons, the argument for curtailing any fuel source seems ill-timed. In fact, the counterfactual is a more appropriate discussion, and energy thought leaders are recognizing that powering the AI revolution with wind and solar alone isn’t feasible.Expecting electric power to meet the exploding power needs of AI while also insisting that consumers use it to meet their basic cooking and heating needs feels like it is entering “too many eggs in one basket” territory. American consumers are right to bristle at being forced to rely on an energy source facing rapidly growing demand and potential unintended consequences—brownouts, grid instability and rising prices—when affordable, clean-burning, carbon-beneficial fuels can meet those needs without further straining an already burdened grid. Author: Tim Portz&nbsp; Executive Director, Pellet Fuels Institute&nbsp; tim@pelletheat.org

Something About Eggs and Baskets

Related Stories

EIA: Industrial sector expected to consume more wood for energy in 2025, 2026

Senators urge EPA to abandon plans to reallocate waived SRE volumes

New study shows EPA ‘half RIN’ proposal would keep US soybean demand strong

Court directs EPA to provide update on status of 2026 RFS RVOs within 7 days

SAF Act aims to extend 45Z credit, reinstate SAF premium

Upcoming Events

2026 International Biomass Conference & Expo

Something About Eggs and Baskets.css-7jxktu{position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;right:0px;height:3px;border-radius:3px;background-color:var(--chakra-colors-brandBlack);}