Industrial dryers tend to have gaseous and particulate emissions. One of the largest sources of emissions is from the creation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), by thermally damaging product in the dryer itself. Smaller infeed particles can be lost through the cyclones or secondary cleanup. Why should you care? If a dryer is large enough, the U.S. EPA requires secondary cleanup, anyway. You should care because you could be losing a lot of money. If your dryer processes 800,000 metric tons at 45% moisture content (MC) wet basis, you would expect 488,889 metric tonnes at 10% MC wet basis to come out. If you are thermally damaging product and driving off VOCs, however, that is not what you will get. If you damage 1% of the dry solids, which is relatively easy to do, your loss is on the order of $750,000. If you are damaging 4% of your dry solids, still not a big stretch, that is almost $3 million worth (Figure 1). If you ignore thermal damage and only look at particulate emissions, you have a similar situation. Again, you expect be getting out 488,889 metric tonnes per year, but if your cyclones are 98% efficient, you are blowing away almost $1.5 million every year (Figure 2). Particulate emissions can be partially recovered in a baghouse, but most plants have gone away from them due to the fire risk. It&rsquo;s important to conceptualize what happens in a dryer. Everyone has a clothes dryer at home, so people tend to think it is a relatively simple piece of equipment. Imagine buying brand new, fluffy towels. Then, you wash and dry them a couple times. They produce a lot of lint! Your dryer is thermally damaging the towels. We can envision the lint as VOCs, and eventually, you will end up with thin, scratchy, not-so-fluffy towels. Just think&mdash;you want to sell fluffy towels, not thin towels.&nbsp; Dryers that are thermally damaging product typically have a harsh drying environment. A harsh drying environment would be similar to putting a burger on the grill too early, with charcoal that is too hot. The result is a burger that&rsquo;s crispy and burnt on the outside, and still cold and red on the inside. Most dryer operators will decide that product like this is actually underdried, not thermally damaged, and will turn up the temperature, leading to a good chance of overdrying. In a harsh drying environment, there will never be a happy medium. This brings us to the discussion of bound moisture vs. free moisture. Consider water droplets on a leaf to be free moisture, while the moisture in the leaf itself can be considered bound moisture. Evaporating free moisture off the surface of a product is relatively easy and straight forward, but evaporating the bound moisture is not. It is the method employed to evaporate the bound moisture that determines level of thermal damage. A harsh drying environment is a low wet bulb drying environment. The wet bulb temperature (Twb) is the temperature that water evaporates at, as opposed to the dry bulb temperature (Tdb), which is what&rsquo;s read on a thermometer. If children are playing in the sprinklers in the summer, their wet shirts will feel much cooler on a dry day than on a humid day. The temperature felt would be considered the wet bulb temperature. When a drying system heats atmospheric air, the best-case wet bulb temperature that can be reached at the product inlet of the dryer is a maximum of about 80 degrees Fahrenheit in the summer (much lower in the winter).&nbsp; As soon as that a particle enters the hot drying gases, well over 80 degrees F, the surface or free moisture flashes dry, leaving a dry cellulose layer, which just happens to be a great insulator. The particle continues traveling along with the hot gases trying to penetrate the insulating cellulose layer, which causes the unprotected shell of the particle to overheat and become thermally damaged. The heat from the drying gases eventually penetrate the cellulose boundary, and water vapor begins to travel from the inside of the particle to the outside, forming a protective vapor barrier to allow more efficient heat transfer into the particle, and for the bound moisture to finally evaporate. The goal is to get the protective vapor barrier around the particle immediately, instead of letting it become thermally damaged. Water droplets bouncing around on a hot skillet, or dipping a hand into liquid nitrogen, would demonstrate the Leidenfrost Effect. There is a temporary vapor barrier formed to protect the water droplets or hand. Creating a protective vapor barrier around the product is exactly how to prevent thermal damage in a dryer. Accomplish this by raising the wet bulb temperature, increasing the water vapor content of the drying gases. When the particle enters, instead of the surface moisture immediately reaching the wet bulb temperature, it has to be heated to about 170 degrees F, the new wet bulb temperature. Because the insulating cellulose layer is never formed in this instance, heat is transferred much more efficiently into the interior of the particle, without thermal damage. The water is able to move freely from the interior of the particle to the exterior and be evaporated. The first line of defense against particulate emissions is mechanical separation. There are many rotary drum dryer systems out there that send all the product through the cyclones. Even with cyclones at 98% separation efficiency, a lot of money is being wasted. Using a classifying outlet hopper before the cyclones can improve overall separation efficiency, even if it decreases the actual separation efficiency of the cyclones. If the outlet hopper removes 85% of the product from the gas stream before going to cyclones, less product is being sent to the cyclones. That action likely drops cyclone separation efficiency because they are getting less product, but if 95% separation efficiency is maintained, only about $550,000 will be lost, rather than close to $1.4 million, making a net gain of $900,000. There are ways to increase cyclone separation efficiency if it is not possible to add a classifying outlet hopper before the cyclones. Adding a drop or catch box at the bottom of the cyclone cone is important to stop the particles from spinning, but the most crucial thing that can be done is placement of an airlock at the outlet of every cyclone, or below every cyclone drop box, and ensuring they are well maintained, with rotors replaced every year or two. No cyclone is identical and there will always be differences in pressure, so without an airlock, or with worn airlocks, one cyclone can pull through a conveyor or chute, into another cyclone, and bring already-separated product back out. Not only are emissions bad for the environment, they are bad for your bottom line. Thermal damage combined with particulate loss can easily be on the order of $1 million to $4.5 million worth of losses. We like to say &ldquo;don&rsquo;t let moisture dampen your profits,&rdquo; but we could also say &ldquo;don&rsquo;t let thermal damage combust your profits,&rdquo; and &ldquo;don&rsquo;t let particulate emissions blow away your profits.&rdquo; &nbsp; Author: Becky Long Dryer Design Engineer, Thompson Dryers beckyl@thompsondryers.com 785-272-7722

2019/05/THOMPSON-DRYERS_15580972507956_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/THOMPSON-DRYERS_15580972507956_thumb.jpg

2019/05/THOMPSON-DRYERS_15580972507956.jpg

2019/05/AmbientTemp_15580972468189.jpg

2019/05/AmbientTemp2_15580972477773.jpg

2019/05/Fig1-PelletMill_15580972487665.jpg

2019/05/Fig2-PelletMill_15580972498128.jpg

One of the largest sources of emissions is from the creation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), by thermally damaging product in the dryer itself. 

Saving the Environment and Bottom Lines by Reducing Emissions

When it rains, it pours. As of late, the saying has had a dual meaning for some U.S. domestic market pellet producers. Not only did many regions in the central and eastern states see the wettest year on record, but a series of market forces have and may continue to impact fiber availability and prices for some. The effects of excessively wet weather&mdash;relentless rainfall that broke many annual precipitation records&mdash;first posed challenges for loggers, keeping them out of the woods, thus trucks of wood from mills, and extending what is dubbed as &ldquo;mud season.&rdquo; The fewer trucks available, the fewer loads of fiber, and the more competition to get it. &ldquo;It took until about mid-January to beginning of February before we actually took a hit from the wet weather,&rdquo; says Jeremy Watson, BioMaxx vice president of production and procurement. &ldquo;We knew it was coming, though&mdash;we have sources in the logging industry. When the saw mills drop log inventory because they can&rsquo;t get them, that changes production a lot,&rdquo; he says. That means producers like BioMaxx have to pivot. &ldquo;We prefer to run on 100 percent sawdust, as it takes less energy and produces a better pellet, but when sawmills can&rsquo;t produce, we have to switch to wood chips,&rdquo; Watson says. &ldquo;So the wet weather was definitely the start of the situation we&rsquo;re in.&rdquo; BioMaxx owns and operates two wood pellet plants&mdash;PA Wood Pellets in Ulysses, Pennsylvania, and Dry Creek Wood Pellets in Pittsford, New York. Total, the plants can produce around 80,000 tons of wood pellets annually&mdash;notably, hardwood pellets, which the company has been manufacturing for more than 25 years. &ldquo;The whole fiber side of the business has changed dramatically in a six-month period, but overall, the story is that there are difficulties out there, based on the fact that where we are sourcing our product from is struggling,&rdquo; says Dan Wetzel, BioMaxx vice president of sales and marketing. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s having an effect on us and other manufacturers, and there are changes we have to make to flex with that.&rdquo; The next part of the equation is the ongoing trade war with China, the effects of which began impacting fiber suppliers last fall. Hardwood Lumber Tariffs For U.S. hardwood exporters, 2018 started off strong. &ldquo;But things fell off a cliff after tariffs were announced in the summer,&rdquo; explains Tripp Pryor, U.S. Hardwood Lumber Export Association international program manager. &ldquo;By the end of 2018, we were only down 16 percent by volume compared to 2017, thanks to a record start of the year for exports to China. But so far in 2019, we&rsquo;re down 51 percent across all species, and we&rsquo;re down 60 percent for all wood products.&rdquo; In simple terms, China was taking in more than half of all U.S. hardwood exports&mdash;about half of grade lumber production in the U.S., according to Pryor. That is, before retaliatory tariff rates of 5 to 15% went into effect. Rates of 25% were set for April, but temporarily frozen in midst of negotiations. &nbsp;&ldquo;When one out of every four boards we produce is going to a single market, any disturbance is bound to send shockwaves throughout the industry,&rdquo; Pryor says. &ldquo;There are other factors involved&mdash;China&rsquo;s currency devaluation and slowing economy also play a role&mdash;but the retaliatory tariffs imposed on U.S. hardwood products are the single largest reason we have such a difficult climate in the hardwood industry today. It makes a lot of sense for hardwood producers to slow down production because prices haven&rsquo;t been stable and demand has been fickle. It does make sense there is increased competition for sawdust with many companies scaling down production in the face of global trade challenges.&rdquo; Blue Ridge Lumber Co., a hardwood sawmill in&nbsp; Fishersville, Virginia, produces over 35 million board feet of lumber annually, also supplying mulch, sawdust and other byproducts to customers. The company&rsquo;s sales to China saw an abrupt stop in the wake of the trade war, according to president Tom Sheets. &ldquo;It made a bad situation worse,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;China&rsquo;s economy was already shrinking and the tariffs caused an abrupt disruption in the market, resulting in an uncertain demand, therefore lower prices. Our pricing to China is off 20 to 30 percent.&rdquo; The hardwood industry is a friendly causality on both sides of the water in this trade dispute.&rdquo; Sheets says while some other markets have been active and prices have begun to recover somewhat, some production has left the market indefinitely. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s had to have made a difference in the availability of wood fiber from pallets to chips to sawdust,&rdquo; he says.&nbsp; Pryor agrees with Sheets that there are other global bright spots for exports. &ldquo;But even Vietnam, which now is a larger market for American hardwoods than Mexico and imports more lumber by volume than the entire EU, can&rsquo;t fully replace losses in China. The only market that could replace that demand is the U.S., where we have seen wood consumption per capita drop as laminate flooring and plastic substitutes have taken over.&rdquo; While the initial round of tariffs didn&rsquo;t affect BioMaxx or the lumber market, the second round did. And, if the 25 percent tariff were to hit, &ldquo;it would shut down some saw mills,&rdquo; says Watson. &ldquo;We have had two of our major suppliers tell us, &lsquo;We&rsquo;re causing our own problems, so we&rsquo;re going to reduce our own production. The tariffs aren&rsquo;t bothering us too much, because we&rsquo;ve shared the cost with our buyers&mdash;each took half and it&rsquo;s been okay, just as long as the next one doesn&rsquo;t come.&rsquo;&nbsp; But they also said they were not going to flood the market with lumber; rather, they would reduce labor and production hours. For our main supplier, that meant almost 50,000 feet a day they weren&rsquo;t selling because they pulled back 40-hour weeks&mdash;that&rsquo;s a huge amount of raw material.&rdquo; And, Watson adds, there are at least three pellet plants pulling from that supplier. &ldquo;Loyalty goes a long way to a point, but when your prices go up by 20 or 25 percent when we have those kind of increases, something has to happen,&rdquo; he says. &nbsp;Hamer Pellet Fuel is another facility facing fiber constraints. The plant&rsquo;s parent company operates four sawmills and two kiln dry facilities, and has been producing hardwood lumber for over 70 years, according to Sales Manager Todd Webb, who has been employed at the company for 16 years, half of which he has been managing sales for the pellet plant.&nbsp; With the decline of the U.S. furniture manufacturing industry, less material has been available in the past 10-plus years, Hamer says, and while the current situation is making the situation much worse&mdash;the wet weather and tariffs&mdash;so there are also contributing issues in the trucking industry. &ldquo;We came off two on the wettest years on record&mdash;the Northeast region&mdash;but we also have a transportation crisis in this industry,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;There aren&rsquo;t enough trucks available to the general manufacturer, you can only get so many. You might have all of the volume you need, but you can only get so many trucks. It also creates a rising cost as to what you have to pay to get that truck, and if not another pellet fuel competitor, it might be someone with higher margins.&rdquo;&nbsp; Trucking Complications Wilson and Watson reiterated Webb&rsquo;s views on trucking. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the issue that&rsquo;s affected our market&mdash; the new law for these electronic logging devices (ELD),&rdquo; Watson says. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s really, really hurt us. We&rsquo;re not saying it isn&rsquo;t a good thing overall, but it wasn&rsquo;t looked into it enough to understand the whole situation&mdash;these guys can only run about 150 miles a day roundtrip.&rdquo; In short, the new ELD mandate&mdash;aimed at making for safer driving conditions and protecting drivers from being forced to work too many hours&mdash;requires electronic ELDs for drivers who are required to maintain records of duty status, and track a driver&rsquo;s hours of service, as well as data about the vehicle and its driver. Critics say the new law costs thousands of dollars annually for compliance, leads to greater driver turnaround and requires more driver training and device maintenance, among other issues. And, drivers complain that work hours are capped, even though half of the time on-duty might be at a loading or unloading site and not on the road, so their paychecks are shrinking. And, beating the clock becomes of utmost importance, creating more hazards on the road. In the case of hauling fiber, Watson says that now, they sometimes just don&rsquo;t have enough time. &ldquo;We use a lot of local guys to haul raw material, so they make a loop and they are back home, but now, they end up being about 50 miles short. Or even our guys who haul our heating pellets&mdash;they can&rsquo;t come into Buffalo and drop a load, and run all the way back to Massachusetts. They run out of time, and they might be just an hour short. So this has really affected the raw material side, and also the finished side.&rdquo; The pellet industry is low-margin and relies heavily on trucking, Wetzel reiterates. &ldquo;Now, drivers are driving less, and people aren&rsquo;t being hired. New drivers don&rsquo;t really exist&mdash;there is a massive issue with the number of truckers there are right now, and the hours they can drive.&rdquo;&nbsp; Meanwhile, impacted producers are rolling with the punches, which includes changing fiber sources if they can. Pivoting and Planning Switching from dry saw dust to green fiber is a possibility, but it&rsquo;s an added cost. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re hauling 50 percent water to our plant, then,&rdquo; Webb says. &ldquo;That green material now has to go through another manufacturing process, a drum dryer, so it&rsquo;s an added energy cost.&rdquo; Webb says fiber costs have gone up substantially from last year. He suggested an analysis of&nbsp; the U.S. EIA&rsquo;s Monthly Densified Fuel Report data&mdash;which requires pellet producers to report feedstock purchases and average weighted cost for roundwood timber, sawmill residue, wood product manufacturing residue, and other residuals&mdash;but the EIA does not release data on a regional basis. Rather, each region&rsquo;s data is added together and averaged, and that information is provided to the public. Being the pellet industry and fiber markets vary greatly by region, Pellet Mill Magazine made a request to learn more about regional feedstock pricing data, but EIA declined, citing reasons of confidentially and business sensitivities. The report is released about three months behind, so though no drastic price jumps have yet been reflected in the report, that could change in the coming months. According to BioMaxx, costs for the company are up about 10 percent from a year ago. Now, the company is bringing in wood chips. &ldquo;That that puts a different problem in front of us,&rdquo; Watson says. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re running into the paper and chip board companies as competitors. Composite board manufacturers use a certain percentage of fiber, and they&rsquo;re pulling from that same stream as paper, chip and pellet manufacturers. That&rsquo;s where we have lost most of our fiber to in the past three months. We&rsquo;re actually bring round wood now, too.&rdquo; All of the aforementioned challenges combined have created bidding wars, Webb says. &ldquo;Financially, pellet mills can&rsquo;t source pellet fuel 250 miles away from the plant,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;And even though you may have sawmills or a secondary manufacture close to your plant, someone else not even in this industry will now reach into those markets and bid for that raw material.&rdquo; Unfortunately, raising the price of hardwood pellets may be inevitable for some. &ldquo;If the next tariff hits, we&rsquo;ll have to,&rdquo; Watson says. Webb adds that because of the trade war driving costs up and availability down, the real crisis hitting pellet fuel manufacturer may be that homeowners have other heating options in their homes. &ldquo;The reason most people put in a pellet heating unit in is to save money over that other heat source,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;If they aren&rsquo;t saving, they might back away.&rdquo;&nbsp; &nbsp;As to anything in the industry&rsquo;s control that can be done, Webb says educating the consumer to buy pellets year-round could make a huge difference. &ldquo;First, they&rsquo;ll save money, typically,&rdquo; he explains. &ldquo;Purchasing pellets in April, May or July, they can get them at a lesser price than fall or winter, and then there won&rsquo;t be that situation where they can&rsquo;t get any.&rdquo; &ldquo;We base a lot of our marketing on that,&rdquo; Wetzel says. &ldquo;The more we can level it out, and make it not just a high-point, low-point market, the better off it is for everyone. Independent retailers make the biggest chunk of our business. The utmost importance to Big Box retailers is that they just want product in the heating season, and it does make it that more difficult.&rdquo; Letting Big Box stores influence consumers&rsquo; decisions about when to buy product is counterproductive to market expansion, from Webb&rsquo;s perspective. &ldquo;It could create false senses of shortages when they don&rsquo;t have them anymore, when they could buy pellets at a hearth dealer or local distributor.&rdquo; Consumers buying product year-round could help producers secure more raw material during this time of the year, a scenario that also weighs less on the timing and availability of trucks, he says. As an industry, how can we achieve this? &ldquo;We can&rsquo;t change the retailer&rsquo;s business model, but the consumer can,&rdquo; Webb says. &ldquo;If the consumer buys from a local retailer, we can spread out our ability. If we are out there moving more fuel month by month in the spring, summer and fall, we will try to run more. If it comes to a stop then we stop, and we don&rsquo;t secure additional raw material that might be available right now, but not later.&rdquo; For now, with eyes on China and potential tariff increases, Watson says BioMaxx is working out its strategies. &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t have just one,&rdquo; he adds. &ldquo;You have to have two or three plans, because things change so fast.&rdquo; Editors note: At press time, China&rsquo;s Ministry of Finance announced that it would increase tariffs on 5,140 U.S. goods starting on June 1, in retaliation to U.S. increases on Chinese products the first week in May. In its initial reaction statements, the National Hardwood Lumber Association says although not confirmed at these levels yet, it seems likely that U.S. wood imports to China will be tariffed at the rates announced prior to the freeze&mdash;oak species at 25%, cherry and ash at 20%. Author: Anna Simet Editor, Pellet Mill Magazine asimet@bbiinternational.com 701-738-4961

2019/05/Fiber-Factors_15580976299135_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/Fiber-Factors_15580976299135_thumb.jpg

2019/05/Fiber-Factors_15580976299135.jpg

Wet weather, the China trade war and new commercial trucking laws could soon impact fiber supply and prices for some producers, if not already.

Fiber Factors

In April, Skeena Bioenergy Ltd. began commissioning its brand new pellet plant in the forested, mountainous West Canadian terrain of Terrace, British Columbia. Construction on the pellet mill began just nine months prior in an existing, vacant building on a site adjacent to Skeena Sawmill Ltd.&rsquo;s operations. Local pioneer Bill McRae originally built the neighboring lumber mill in 1960, after which it changed hands a number of times through the years. The latest acquisition of the sawmill was in 2011, when Roc Holdings Ltd. bought the business from West Fraser Timber Co. Roc Holdings is an investment company established by Teddy Cui, an emigrant with enterprising in his blood, as he hails from a wealthy, entrepreneurial Chinese family. Since acquiring the shuttered business, Roc Holdings restarted operations in 2013 and invested in major upgrades to the lumber mill and planer. The sawmill produces planed lumber of various dimensions, from 45 millimeters (mm) thick to between 90 and 300 mm wide and 2.5 to 6 meters long. &ldquo;A vast majority of our lumber business is in China, so we produce metric dimensions for that market,&rdquo; says Roger Keery, vice president of operations for Skeena Sawmill and president of Skeena Bioenergy. While the Chinese market absorbs a vast majority of Skeena&rsquo;s lumber supply, the mill also manufactures product for other Asian markets, including Taiwan and Hong Kong. On occasion, Skeena fulfills North American orders in Imperial, or standard, dimensions as well. In addition to planed boards, Skeena makes large green posts and timbers sized up to 12x12 inches. &ldquo;We still have large logs in the area, so those products fit our log profile,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;We try to take advantage of that.&rdquo; The predominant tree species in the region are Hemlock and Balsam Fir. &ldquo;Those constitute about 85 percent of our standing forest, and that&rsquo;s the species group we solely process,&rdquo; Keery says. Skeena Sawmill currently processes 400,000 cubic meters of timber per year on two lines with one-and-a-half shifts per day. &ldquo;We have forest licenses from the provincial government to log 316,000 cubic meters per year,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;We purchase volumes needed outside of that.&rdquo; The company performs its own forestry but contracts loggers to harvest and deliver the timbers from up to 150 kilometers (km) away, with the sweet spot being under 50 km. A New Way When Skeena Sawmill restarted operations in 2013, the local pulp mill was closed, so a critical issue for Cui and Roc Holdings became what to do with all the residuals&mdash;80,000 green metric tons, or about 40,000 dry tons, per year&mdash;from its sawmill operations. &ldquo;In the past, it had all gone to the pulp mill,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;Now, we are quite a distance from anyone that would want to buy it. There is a high cost to transport it that far or to landfill it. We looked at a number of alternatives and we concluded that a pellet mill would be the best choice. We saw it as the first and critical step in making this sawmill business successful. We had established the business, and we attracted a good customer base and employee group, but we needed to recapitalize. The sawmilling business is very challenging in this area. This pellet plant was the first major capital investment in our operations, and the first major step to changing Skeena&rsquo;s future.&rdquo; Skeena Sawmill established Skeena Bioenergy as a wholly owned subsidiary. The company contracted Prodesa to design the CAN$20 million pellet mill with a nameplate capacity of 75,000 metric tons per year. Construction began in July 2018. Keery says beyond the sawmill residuals, Skeena Bioenergy is securing additional material from two sources. &ldquo;One is we&rsquo;re purchasing material from logging operations in the area, which are known, recoverable volumes,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;And two, we have a whole log chipping program. The chips from whole log chipping are barged down the coast to pulp producers in B.C., but the bark and screen fines are sent to the pellet mill.&rdquo; With the pellet mill using only bark from its whole log chipping program to supplement the sawmill&rsquo;s residuals, its pellets have a high bark content. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re vetting this concept of high-bark pellets,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;There are two issues with bark. One is the heating value, and the other is ash content. The heating value for our bark is identical to white wood, so that&rsquo;s not an issue. On the ash, we&rsquo;ve spent significant time looking at this. Hemlock bark doesn&rsquo;t appear to have the entrained ash other species have, and early results indicate we can meet product specifications with the higher bark content.&rdquo;
Keery says approximately 11 percent of Skeena&rsquo;s Hemlock wood volume is bark, which is 3 to 4 percent higher than other species. &ldquo;The bark is thicker,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a significant resource for us, and we have to take advantage of that.&rdquo; Skeena&rsquo;s Hemlock hails from the north-central coast of British Columbia where the climate and terrain produce a lower average grade of wood, Keery says. &ldquo;For us, using a lot of the lower-grade material is key to our success and business,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;On the pellet side, we use all parts of the tree, including the bark. On the sawmill side, we use lower-grade logs to chip for pulp, or saw what we can to extract lumber out of them. We&rsquo;ve even tested the concept of pure bark pellets and believe there is a place for this in the market. We produce an IS2-grade pellet by blending bark and white wood and will continue to experiment, being careful to ensure we can meet IS2 specs. We have the ability to blend biomass going into the pellet mill. This system is critical to managing the ash content to keep it within the IS2 limit, whether it&rsquo;s 30 or 50 percent bark. The chemical analysis meets the spec.&rdquo; Prodesa built the pellet mill with separate infeed systems to control the incoming blend of feedstock. The white wood and hog bark are mixed separately and blended together to get the specified ratio required to make an on-spec pellet. From there, the blended feedstock is fed into a single Bruks hammer mill and then into a Swiss Combi gas-fired belt dryer. After drying, the product goes into a Promill dry hammer mill and is then transported via a pneumatic system with a cyclone filter into three Promill pelletizers. The freshly made pellets are then sent through cooling, screening and into a 200-ton silo set up for truck shipment. &ldquo;Our nameplate capacity is 75,000 tons, but I might add that, with three machines, others might boast a nameplate capacity of up to 120,000 tons,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;The reason our nameplate is 75,000 tons is because we planned for significant redundancy and projected higher maintenance downtime due to the high bark content. Our runability remains to be seen, but this is why our nameplate is lower than what people might expect with three machines. If we can manage that issue, I think 100,000 tons a year is within reason with the installed capacity we have. We sized our dryer to allow us to do that. We are being conservative on our nameplate because we are not sure how the bark issue will work out in practice.&rdquo; Offtake Pacific BioEnergy announced this winter it had secured a long-term offtake agreement with Skeena Bioenergy to purchase Skeena&rsquo;s pellets. Pacific BioEnergy owns and operates a 350,000-ton pellet mill in Prince George, British Columbia. Pacific BioEnergy also has minority interests in two other pellet mills in British Columbia and, overall, it produces, purchases and manages more than 500,000 tons of pellets annually. In July 2017, the Japanese company Sumitomo Corp. acquired 48 percent of Pacific BioEnergy. &ldquo;Sumitomo is a major player in the Japanese wood pellet market,&rdquo; says John Stirling, president of Pacific BioEnergy. &ldquo;Sumitomo controls a significant volume of pellets in the utility market in Japan with dedicated biomass power plants as well as cofiring opportunities. For them, they really wanted to have a good footprint in that market, so they decided it was very useful for them to invest upstream.&rdquo; Stirling says about 80 percent of Pacific BioEnergy&rsquo;s 500,000-plus tons of pellet supplies are destined for Japan, with the remainder going to Europe. &ldquo;In the past three to four years our market focus was shifting to Japan,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a significant market with a lot of room for growth.&rdquo; Stirling says even though the trend to move its supply to Japan was well underway when Sumitomo joined Pacific BioEnergy, its investment &ldquo;accelerated&rdquo; this development.&nbsp; &ldquo;The Skeena pellet volume is currently flowing into our existing customer base as the operation starts up,&rdquo; Stirling says. Pacific BioEnergy just received and unloaded its first railcars full of Skeena Bioenergy pellets at the Fibreco Export Inc. terminal in North Vancouver. Keery says Skeena looked at the option of taking on partners prior to its decision to build the pellet mill, but ultimately the company decided to finance the plant alone so as to not give up equity. &ldquo;Once we made that decision, we moved to plant design and construction, and then we went looking for customers for our product,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;We hired marketing consultant Brodie Govan of Voyage Power to help us. He and Rick Harris, vice president of sales and marketing for Skeena, found three customers prepared to give firm quotes. We felt the best offer was from Pacific BioEnergy.&rdquo; The offtake agreement is a multiyear contract with a renewal option. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a great arrangement and we&rsquo;re really happy with it,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;That said, the pellet market in Japan is very robust with plenty of potential buyers, but it&rsquo;s important to find the right ones. The most challenging aspect of the business is the logistics of getting our product to the customer. Customers want reliability and scale, and we are pretty small in the sector. So for us to be a part of a bigger volume with Pacific BioEnergy allows us to ship our product by bulk cargo vessels carrying 30,000 to 40,000 tons, which is six to eight months of Skeena&rsquo;s production.&rdquo; Pacific BioEnergy has its own dedicated fleet of railcars and a reliable port terminal through Fibreco in North Vancouver. Stirling points out that Pacific BioEnergy&rsquo;s railcars move back and forth from the Terrace area to the Fibreco port where Skeena&rsquo;s pellets are merged with other supplies and sent to Japan. &nbsp;&ldquo;Smaller companies don&rsquo;t have the ability to fill ships, so contracting with us provides them with a good, steady takeaway, good and reliable pricing and good payment terms,&rdquo; Stirling says. &ldquo;It makes sense for them to tap into the scale and infrastructure we have. We also have a lot of market intelligence, so they get the advantage of all of this.&rdquo; Furthermore, Stirling says what also helped Pacific BioEnergy land the offtake contract with Skeena was the people working on the deal. &ldquo;I think what made the difference is we had good people working on all sides&mdash;Roger and Rick from Skeena, and Paul Kalil, our vice president of capital projects, and Sumitomo&rsquo;s Takayasu Nakamura,&rdquo; Stirling says. &ldquo;Taka and Paul spent time developing a good relationship with Rick and Roger. What they liked about us is that our operations are relatively close by, and that we have very similar business styles. We had a good meeting of the minds. I think what also helped is the fact that Sumitomo invested here in British Columbia, and Skeena Sawmill is Asia-focused with its markets in China, and they were willing to work with us to put contracted volumes into the Japanese market.&rdquo; While Pacific BioEnergy is buying virtually all of Skeena Bioenergy&rsquo;s pellets, a provision exists in the contract that includes a small carve-out for local heating market sales. &ldquo;We want to support that, and they do too,&rdquo; Stirling says. Keery adds, &ldquo;We strongly believe we should service the local retail market. This is a very small volume at present, but it is important to the community and outlying towns where natural gas is not available.&rdquo; Pushing Through Navigating the unknowns of a new business sector has been challenging, but Keery says thanks to the expertise of hired personnel, the process has been rewarding. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re thrilled with the people we hired,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;They&rsquo;re critical to our success.&rdquo; The establishment of the new pellet mill generated 16 new jobs so far for the Terrace area. Keery says training is underway and, as the plant increases shifting, four more jobs will likely be created. The regulatory challenges have been daunting at times, Keery says, but the end result is an ultraclean process. &ldquo;Often there is no visible discharge from the plant stacks,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;When the dryer is running on a warm day, you can see nothing coming out of the plant. One of our neighbors, a truck repair shop, wasn&rsquo;t even aware we started up.&rdquo; Another hurdle to overcome well after project development began was the inception of the sustainable biomass partnership program. &ldquo;During the course of construction, the industry agreed not to mix certified and noncertified pellets,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;This went into effect March 30, so we had to get certification. We started the process in January and just received our certification in late April.&rdquo; These include chain of custody and sustainable biomass certifications. Financing the $20 million project proved to be an interesting endeavor, particularly so thanks to contemporaneous geopolitical world events. &ldquo;Our owner Teddy Cui financed the project through the bank his family business works with in China,&rdquo; Keery says. &ldquo;During the project, the Huawei executive was charged here and the current trade conflict with China began. A consequence of this was our funding was restricted about two months before the project was finished. Our owner had to scramble to find alternate arrangements and we had some really difficult times with payables. It took some time, but we managed to get this sorted out, pay everyone and complete the project. Our contractors and suppliers continued to support us through this, and we certainly appreciate it.&rdquo; As Skeena Bioenergy moves forward with commissioning in April and into May, Keery says he hopes to sign off on the acceptance test for the plant with Prodesa by late May. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re still commissioning, but we&rsquo;re right in the middle of transition,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;We have a punch list of things to address. On the operations side, we are crewed for five-day weeks, and we are training all operators. We&rsquo;re sorting through the glitches in the system but we are producing. I&rsquo;ll be happy if we hit our 75,000-ton run rate this year.&rdquo; Author: Ron Kotrba Senior Editor, Pellet Mill Magazine 218-745-8347 rkotrba@bbiinternational.com

Skeena Bioenergy started construction in July 2018 on a pellet mill adjacent to Skeenaâ€™s sawmill in Terrace, B.C. The decision to build a pellet plant was a critical first step in changing the sawmill from a challenging to a successful business. 

2019/05/Skeena-Bioenergy-PMM_15580977559185_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/Skeena-Bioenergy-PMM_15580977559185_thumb.jpg

2019/05/Skeena-Bioenergy-PMM_15580977559185.jpg

Skeena Bioenergy blends hog bark and white wood residues in a dual infeed system. Its pellets are high in bark content but meet the necessary specifications for heating value and ash content. 

2019/05/hogbark-whitewood-pellet_15580977540029.jpg

Skeena Bioenergyâ€™s new pellet mill features three Promill pelletizers. While others with three like machines may boast 120,000 tons per year of nameplate capacity, Skeena built its plant with significant redundancy. 

2019/05/ThreePromill-Pelletizers_15580977570169.jpg

With the local pulp mill closed, a revived sawmill in British Columbia develops a pellet project to turn residue disposal costs into a revenue stream to save the business. 

Saving A Sawmill

Panah joins WPAC, Melin retires The Wood Pellet Association of Canada has appointed Fahimeh Yazdan Panah as director of research and technical development. Panah joins WPAC from the University of British Columbia, where she was a research associate with the Biomass and Bioenergy Research Group. For the past 12 years, she carried out bioenergy research on behalf of the university, governments and private industry clients, focusing on biofuel densification, pretreatment, storage, biomass handling and safety. Panah has co-authored more than 80 technical reports and peer-reviewed publications on the topic of bioenergy, and serves as the project lead within ISO Technical Committee 238 (Solid Biofuels) and chair within ISO Technical Committee 300 (Solid Recovered Biofuels). She received her doctorate and master&rsquo;s degree in applied science from UBC and a bachelor&rsquo;s degree in applied science from the Amirkabir University of Technology in Iran. She is a registered professional engineer with the Association of Engineers and Geoscientists of BC, and a professional project manager with the Project Management Institute. Panah also volunteers as the regional director of the B.C. chapter of the Canadian Society for Bioengineering. Panah joins WPAC as Staffin Melin, director of research, retires. Melin&rsquo;s career in the wood pellets industry was preceded by five years as a trade commissioner for the government of Sweden in Canada, during which time he developed relationships that resulted in the first wood pellet exports from Canada to Europe. Melin has been a leader in developing ISO standards for wood pellets, covering quality, chemical and mechanical testing and safety, and cooperated with the Swedish Research Institute on developing guidelines for extinguishing fires in storage silos. Over his career, Melin has authored or co-authored more than 80 scientific papers, reports and books on biomass processing, safety, logistics and international trade. Pellet Fuels Institute welcomes new members The Pellet Fuels Institute has added two new fuel manufacturers to its membership. Barefoot Pellet in Troy, Pennsylvania, and BioMaxx Inc., with manufacturing facilities in Ulysses, Pennsylvania, and Arcade, New York, have joined as fuel producing members. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re thrilled to add both of these great organizations to the PFI membership roster,&rdquo; said Tim Portz, PFI executive director. &ldquo;Our board chairman, Don Wagner of Appalachian Wood Pellets, and I visited both of these producers last fall and were extremely impressed by their operations and their passion for the industry.&rdquo; Martin&rsquo;s Sales and Service, a specialty hearth retailer in Butler, Pennsylvania, has joined PFI as a retail member, and Novolex&ndash;Yakima as a new supplier member. &ldquo;The pellet manufacturing and distribution supply chain is very interdependent,&rdquo; said Portz. &ldquo;Our diverse membership is a reflection of that interdependency, and we&rsquo;re excited to add these important voices to our ongoing discussion about how to best grow our industry.&rdquo; Murray named Excellence in Bioenergy Award recipient BBI International and Biomass Magazine named Gordon Murray recipient of the annual Excellence in Bioenergy Award, which was presented to Murray at the International Biomass Conference &amp; Expo in Savannah, Georgia. The award recognizes individuals, organizations or companies who have made significant and outstanding contributions to the bioenergy industry. Murray has a bachelor of science in forestry and is a registered forester who has worked in the forest and bioenergy industries for 35 years. Since 2003, he has managed an accounting practice specializing in forest industry mergers and acquisitions, capital raising and management accounting. In 2009, he became the Wood Pellet Association of Canada&rsquo;s executive director, where he works as an ardent advocate on behalf of Canadian producers, traders, ports, terminals, shipping companies, and equipment suppliers. Murray also serves as a committee member for the Sustainable Biomass Partnership, is secretary of the WPAC Safety Committee, and has volunteered to help shape regulations for Canada&rsquo;s Clean Fuel Standard, among many other initiatives. Drax Group hires Baxter as nonexecutive director Drax Group plc has brought John Baxter on board to serve in the role of nonexecutive director. Baxter has extensive energy, engineering and safety experience, with over 45 years spent working across nuclear, electricity, oil and gas sectors. Between 2004 and 2015, Baxter was at BP plc, most recently as group head of engineering and process safety, prior to which he was group engineering director at Powergen plc. Having originally trained as a Royal Navy engineer officer serving on nuclear submarines, Baxter is currently visiting professor of nuclear engineering at the University of Strathclyde. He is also a nonexecutive director of Sellafield Ltd., a nuclear site management company based in Cumbria, North West England, where he chairs the Sellafield Board Committee on Environment, Health, Safety and Security.

2019/05/Baxter_15580978775121.jpg

2019/05/Fahimeh_Yazdan_Panah_15580978795061.jpg

2019/05/Murray_15580978805701.jpg

2019/05/Staffan_Melin_15580978815501.jpg

Business Briefs

Most wood pellet producers work with additional wood-based products, so I thought it would be of interest to share a new development in the global wood chip market.&nbsp; Bioenergy Europe has brought forward the &ldquo;GoodChips&rdquo; program, which is being offered as the first international certification scheme for wood chips as it pertains to their use as a solid biofuel. The certification scheme is intended to cover the whole supply chain from production to delivery. It is designed to facilitate trade to make it more transparent, and to harmonize the quality of various grades of wood chips and hog fuels. I will provide a summary in this column, but if this is of interest to you, then I recommend reviewing the overall program through the website, goodchips.eu. Consistency in wood chip quality has historically been a big issue on a global scale. While wood chips have been produced and traded as solid biofuels for decades, the various heating and energy markets have developed without a proper quality framework, leading to inconsistency in what various producers and users&mdash;and even entire regions&mdash;define as a wood chip. With the publishing of ISO 17225-4 (fuel specifications for graded wood chips) in 2014, global commerce has a starting point for standardizing wood chip quality. Within ISO 17225-4, wood chips are defined based on the material types used, as well as quality criteria such as particle size, fines content, moisture, ash, etc.&nbsp; In 2016, the Biomass Energy Resources Center initiated a project for defining wood chip quality within the U.S., during which it was realized that the criteria within ISO 17225-4 was inadequate for U.S. commerce. This resulted in the development of a national adoption of ISO 17225-4 through the American National Standards Institute and through the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, and is now published as ANSI/ASABE AD17225-4. The resulting National Adoption is being promoted in the U.S. as the basis for wood chip quality when being produced as solid biofuel. It is similar to the original ISO 17225-4 standard, but varies in quality criteria. The biggest differences are in the particle size and moisture requirements. The GoodChips program is largely based on ISO 17225-4 (not the U.S. national adoption), providing a 12-class scheme (eight for wood chips and four for hog fuels) that is intended to cover every profile of producer and end user from industrial to domestic. Chip users are able to review the various quality classes and chose the chip type that will work best for their system, and then make chip purchases to the specified class. Quality criteria of each class is intended to provide assurance that the chip quality will be consistent, that appliances properly matched with chip type will operate efficiently and require less maintenance, that fouling will be minimized, and ultimately, that the life of the overall combustion system will be optimized.&nbsp; The GoodChips program draws parallels with ENplus in that it is being managed by the same team within Bioenergy Europe and makes use of ENplus principles and resources. A few parallels include the adoption of ENplus quality management principles, and both programs use a similar third-party certification process to include certification bodies, inspection bodies and testing bodies. Certification audits can be conducted in conjunction with ENplus audits. Additionally, it includes a system of national partners for administration of the program within each adopting country, and the national partners form the advisory committee. The fact that the GoodChips program follows ISO 17225-4 and not the U.S. national adoption creates an issue for the U.S., in that the GoodChips program is intended to certify wood chips to the quality criteria defined internationally or through the GoodChips program. It is uncertain as to whether the GoodChips program would be willing to allow certification to a national adoption&rsquo;s grade criteria, but this could possibly be a discussion brought forth if there is enough interest. If not, as has been the case with the ENplus wood pellet certification system, the GoodChips program may be more useful to producers of wood chips interested in overseas export opportunities, if and when they become available. Without a doubt, wood chips being produced for intended use as solid biofuels for home, commercial and industrial heating is an emerging market within the U.S. and abroad. It seems logical that a wood chip quality certification scheme could bring consistency to these markets, which would most certainly facilitate the growth of the industry. It would be wise for the U.S. to consider implementing a wood chip quality certification scheme, for which GoodChips may be a vehicle that is already established and appears to be poised for global adoption.&nbsp; Author: Chris Wiberg Manager, Biomass Energy Laboratory 218-428-3583 cwiberg@tpinspection.com

2019/05/Wiberg-Chris-2019_15580979608425_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/Wiberg-Chris-2019_15580979608425_thumb.jpg

2019/05/Wiberg-Chris-2019_15580979608425.jpg

Bioenergy Europe has brought forward the â€œGoodChipsâ€� program, which is being offered as the first international certification scheme for wood chips as it pertains to their use as a solid biofuel. 

Wood Chips, GoodChips

Readers of Pellet Mill Magazine may have heard about Feel Good Heat, a regional campaign aimed at raising consumer awareness about automated wood heat as an excellent alternative to fossil fuels. The Northern Forest Center has worked with dozens of stakeholders for longer than two years to develop and implement this collaborative effort to grow market demand for central, bulk-fed wood pellet heating systems. Now, we&rsquo;re starting to look at creative ways to keep Feel Good Heat going for the long term. So far, the campaign consists of digital marketing (Facebook and Google ads) and grassroots outreach that drive people to www.feelgoodheat.org, which offers clear, attractive information about automated wood heat&mdash;including an animated video showing the journey from forest to pellet mill, to delivery truck to home. The site links to vendors across northern New England, Massachusetts and New York. Companies and organizations that sign on as Feel Good Heat partners gain access to a suite of graphics and collateral, including logos, photos, signage, t-shirts and promotional items that they can incorporate into their own marketing and communications. Like any sustained marketing campaign (think &ldquo;Got Milk?&rdquo;), it takes lots of exposure in different formats and media to start sticking with consumers, so Feel Good Heat needs to reach as many people in as many ways as possible. Feel Good Heat has been funded by a variety of public sources so far, including the New York Wood Products Development Council, Vermont Working Lands Enterprise Initiative, Northern Border Regional Commission, U.S. Economic Development Administration and several private philanthropic foundations. We&rsquo;re deeply grateful for their catalytic investments, which have shown that even modest investment in digital advertising and grassroots outreach using the professional Feel Good Heat materials is driving hundreds of interested consumers to wood heat companies and already leading to sales. It&rsquo;s now time to find a long-term funding and organizational model that allows Feel Good Heat to scale up and make a more substantial impact on the market. We&rsquo;re starting to explore creative opportunities to couple business investment with public funds to create a larger-scale effort that reaches hundreds of thousands of consumers in target demographics and locations across five states. While Feel Good Heat resources currently focus on the Northeast, they could be adapted for use in other regions. With the right national or regional nonprofit partners, we look forward to seeing Feel Good Heat assets take hold more broadly and develop into a more nationally coordinated campaign. The Northern Forest Center looks forward to collaborating with more Pellet Mill Magazine readers to help people feel good about how they heat! Author: Maura Adams Program Director, Northern Forest Center madams@northernforest.org www.northernforest.org

2019/05/Maura-Adams_15580980373373_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/Maura-Adams_15580980373373_thumb.jpg

2019/05/Maura-Adams_15580980373373.jpg

With the right national or regional nonprofit partners, we look forward to seeing Feel Good Heat assets take hold more broadly and develop into a more nationally coordinated campaign.

Feeling Good About Wood Heat

Market development for wood pellets in recent years has been strong, but the increased demand for raw material and larger storage capacities has led to new, challenging hotspots. With more piles, the risk of self-ignition escalates. There is a solution to the risk, however, and it comes with additional, not-so-obvious benefits. It has become very difficult to obtain enough feedstock at reasonable transportation costs. Especially with sawdust, the low density of bulk raw material leads to high tons-per-square-foot storage costs. Even more problematic is the fact that woody raw material for pellets is a reactive fuel, and therefore, self-ignition of bulk material is a constant risk. Once the oxidation shifts from biological to chemical and the heat cannot dissipate due to the size of the pile, woody biomass self-ignites. Self-ignition depends on different factors, such as pile size, time of turnover and moisture. A pile on fire is very difficult to extinguish and can cause long downtimes and supply shortcomings. To reduce self-ignition risk, a solution has to: be airtight and weather resistant, avoid piling of material, be easy to load and unload, and be financially reasonable. Baling, a densification process of loose material into easy-to-handle shapes such as blocks or cylinders, is one possible solution. A bale improves manageability and reduces transportation costs, and importantly, minimizes self-ignition risk due to air tightness. The compression ratio depends on the material. Bark and wood chips, for example, are dense and chunky, so baling can only improve transportation by some 20%. Sawdust can be compressed up to a ratio of 1-to-2, which means baling gives the company the options of either sourcing cheaper from existing suppliers, or increasing the sourcing radius for a higher variety of raw material, which ultimately leads to a more homogeneous feed that smoothens the pelleting process. It also adds the potential to expand production. The floor usage per square foot of compressed material is higher, which is important for plants with scarce storage areas. A 40-foot-high pile of sawdust with a diameter of 170 feet can be reduced to an effective storage floor of approximately 40 feet by 20 feet. However, the compressed material needs debaling, too. A debaler, equipped with automated pallet handling and dust suction system, reduces work to a minimum. Besides improving transportability and storage efficiency, baling raw material can have an additional positive effect by creating sellable byproducts. Bark is usually a poor feedstock because it contains many impurities such as sand or metal, and therefore increases wear on the equipment (especially the roller shells) and maintenance (cleaning of magnets). Due to the higher ash content, only a few bark varieties can be used for PFI or ENplus residential heating pellets, and not every dryer is able to run on bark. Bark is an essential ingredient of bituminous peat, turf and mulch, however, and therefore a valuable raw material. Bark is also used as a decorative ground cover and can reach prices of $15 per cubic foot, or $405 per cubic yard. In short, a baling system might swiftly pay off for companies that deal with long-distance transportation of loose raw material, are able to sell byproducts to nearby turf producers, or have inadequate storage capabilities.&nbsp; Author: Holger Streetz International Operations Manager, Bathan AG h.streetz@bathan.ch +491-735918-550

2019/05/Holger_15580981052972_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/Holger_15580981052972_thumb.jpg

2019/05/Holger_15580981052972.jpg

Market development for wood pellets in recent years has been strong, but the increased demand for raw material and larger storage capacities has led to new, challenging hotspots.

From Risk to Benefit 

While on a pellet supply chain and member tour in Washington and Oregon in early May, I had the opportunity to visit multiple locations of Coastal Farm &amp; Ranch, a multistore retailer in the Pacific Northwest that I profiled in a story for Pellet Mill Magazine a couple of years ago. My conversations with store managers, hearth managers and the lead category buyer for Coastal underscored my belief that the health of the wood pellet industry will forever very tightly correlate with the passion and expertise in selling wood pellet appliances found within the retail segment. A stop at Coastal&rsquo;s Yakima store really drove this point home. In conversation, the store manager told me he had spent several years managing the location&rsquo;s hearth department and had even performed service calls. Very quickly, the conversation turned to specific appliance models, optimized fuel and air ratios and the technological leaps that appliances have made since his time in the hearth department. The breadth and depth of his knowledge was impressive&mdash;the pellet-burning customers in his service area have a great resource available to them. What really struck me was the years of accumulated experience required to become that knowledgeable, and the importance of harnessing that expertise and passion as an organization. In 2018, the Pellet Fuels Institute implicitly connected our fortunes with those of our retail partners by launching our market-growth strategy Operation 100k, a broad effort to return annual pellet appliance sales to a minimum of 100,000 units. I&rsquo;m happy to report that in 2019, the PFI will make the importance of the retailer/fuel manufacturer relationship more explicit by adding at least one retail representative to our board of directors. As this issue of Pellet Mill Magazine goes to press, our nominations committee is finalizing the ballot for our incoming board members, and we&rsquo;re actively recruiting from the retail community. While I&rsquo;m not surprised, I remain humbled by the interest within this community to support our organization with their time and energy. After all, pellet appliances represent a small fraction of the overall sales of most specialty hearth retailers. A recent article in the May issue of Hearth &amp; Home revealed that just 12% of heating appliance sales are pellet appliances. The owners and operators of specialty hearth, barbecue and patio stores face the enormous challenge of staying abreast of a rapidly expanding suite of products and technologies, competing with online retailers and complying with changing federal regulations. PFI&rsquo;s invitation to retailers to participate on our board as a means of better understanding our views as manufactures may help them succeed in selling more appliances and fuel. The first question we&rsquo;ll be interested in asking our new retail members is how the PFI can best support their efforts. The aforementioned Hearth &amp; Home article also highlighted the importance of fuel availability to hearth retailers. The enormity of this challenge is well understood by the fuel manufacturers within the PFI, and this year, the industry worked overtime to minimize the impact of extremely tight fiber inventories on our retail partners. While reports of shortages did occur this year, I think the better story is the lesser told one&mdash;the work retailers and pellet manufacturers did together to minimize the frequency and depth of those shortages. Having a retailer on the board will allow the PFI to think more formally, intentionally and strategically about challenges like fuel availability, but we have no intention of stopping there. We fully expect to integrate our new retail board members into our efforts to increase the profile of pellet appliances with consumers, leverage the incredible momentum of the BBQ pellet category to our greatest advantage, and guarantee that once a consumer does choose a pellet-burning appliance, they can readily select a high-quality wood pellet fuel that will perform in their stove reliably. Author: Tim Portz Executive Director, Pellet Fuels Institute tim@pelletheat.org pelletheat.org

2019/05/Portz_15580981661304_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/Portz_15580981661304_thumb.jpg

2019/05/Portz_15580981661304.jpg

The health of the wood pellet industry will forever very tightly correlate with the passion and expertise in selling wood pellet appliances found within the retail segment.

Hand in Glove

Oftentimes, our writers begin interviews with confidence about the conclusions they&rsquo;ll reach when finishing a story, but once in a while, things turn out quite differently. A good example of this is my page-20 feature, &ldquo;Fiber Factors,&rdquo; which was an interesting journey from start to finish. The idea for the story began last fall when I was made aware of the potential impact of Chinese hardwood lumber tariffs, and after hearing about it several more times up until a couple of month ago, I decided to pursue it. To say the least, I was surprised at what I learned from the wood pellet producers willing to chat with me. I discovered the real story is not in the tariffs alone; rather, that issue plus a culmination of factors that could very well impact fiber supply and price for a swathe of domestic market pellet manufacturers. To be clear, those with whom I spoke are by no means insinuating there might be a product shortage next season. When we get into the issue of fiber and sourcing challenges, we have to be cautious not to induce any kind of fear in consumers that they might not be able to get their product when they need it&mdash;that makes sense. But sharing information, ideas and, in this particular case, challenges and precautionary words, is important to the success of the industry as a whole. What I heard several times throughout interviews&mdash;and many times even before this story&mdash;is that if pellet users bought product year-round or early on, it could make a difference. The question is: How do we get the the word out, and explain it in a simplified way? Moving on in this issue centered on feedstock logistics, in Senior Editor Ron Kotrba&rsquo;s page-14 feature, &ldquo;Saving a Sawmill,&rdquo; finding a new, smart way to draw value from its residue was key for the survival Skeena Sawmill when its previous buyer, a local pulp mill, closed. The mill was a long distance from any potential new buyer&mdash;too long to make economic sense. &ldquo;There is a high cost to transport it that far or to landfill it,&rdquo; Roger Keery, vice president of operations for Skeena Sawmill and president of Skeena Bioenergy, told Kotrba. &ldquo;We looked at a number of alternatives and we concluded that a pellet mill would be the best choice &hellip;the sawmilling business is very challenging in this area. This pellet plant was the first major capital investment in our operations, and the first major step to changing Skeena&rsquo;s future.&rdquo; In these times where fiber sourcing is largely misconstrued by environmental groups and the media, and not well understood by consumers, these are the kinds of stories our industry needs to highlight. How many pellet consumers know their product was made from waste sawdust from lumber operations, for example, rather than a tree cut down and ground up for the sole purpose of pellet production? We here at Pellet Mill Magazine write for the industry, but in the current age of social media, we know our reach extends far beyond just pellet plants. We&rsquo;ll keep spreading the word while you share your thoughts and ideas with us, because without the passion, gumption and determination of this industry&rsquo;s stakeholders, we wouldn&rsquo;t have any stories to tell. Author: Anna Simet Editor asimet@bbiinternational.com

2019/05/Anna-Simet-2018_15580982479531_largethumb.jpg

2019/05/Anna-Simet-2018_15580982479531_thumb.jpg

2019/05/Anna-Simet-2018_15580982479531.jpg

Sharing information, ideas and, in this particular case, challenges and precautionary words, is important to the success of the wood pellet industry as a whole.

May/June Pellet Mill

Business Briefs

Business Briefs

Columns

Wood Chips, GoodChips

Feeling Good About Wood Heat

From Risk to Benefit

Hand in Glove

Market Forces of Fiber

Featured

Fiber Factors

Saving A Sawmill

Contributions

Saving the Environment and Bottom Lines by Reducing Emissions

May/June Pellet Mill.css-7jxktu{position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;right:0px;height:3px;border-radius:3px;background-color:var(--chakra-colors-brandBlack);}

Business Briefs

Business Briefs

Columns

Wood Chips, GoodChips

Feeling Good About Wood Heat

From Risk to Benefit

Hand in Glove

Market Forces of Fiber

Featured

Fiber Factors

Saving A Sawmill

Contributions

Saving the Environment and Bottom Lines by Reducing Emissions

May/June Pellet Mill