Print

BPA: Use real-world situation to determine biomass CO2 emissions

By Biomass Power Association | October 26, 2011

Biomass Power Association President and CEO Bob Cleaves addressed the U.S. EPA’s Science Advisory Board Biogenic Carbon Emissions Panel at its meeting Oct. 25 to review its recently released Accounting Framework for Biogenic CO2 Emissions. The panel’s September report could have potentially major implications for the biomass industry by excluding waste wood, which has been recognized as “carbon neutral” by numerous scientists, from CO2 emissions standards.

The panel invited Cleaves to comment at its public meeting, which continues Oct. 26-27. Below are his comments:

“Good morning and thank you for the opportunity to speak. My name is Bob Cleaves and I serve as president of the Biomass Power Association. BPA is the Nation’s leading voice for biomass-to-electricity facilities. We use a wide range of organic waste materials—forestry debris, rice hulls, orchard prunings, urban wood—in the generation of grid-connected electricity.

“My members have been waiting for two years for a well-respected panel of experts to be convened on this important topic. Sadly, in the absence of a national inquiry like we have here today, the issue of biomass and carbon has been hijacked by those who wish to advocate for a narrow renewable energy agenda that is not embraced any other place in the world.

“So on behalf of my members and the thousands of workers in the woods and on farms, we thank you for your service and thank EPA for dedicating the resources necessary for you to do this work.

“We will leave it up to others to discuss the merits of the debt/dividend approach.  Fundamentally, and simply, we believe that so long as carbon stocks are not reduced, bioenergy is favorable from a carbon perspective.

“But we have two thoughts to leave you with.

“First, we ask that you address what is happening in the real world. A little known observation by Manomet (Center for Conservation Sciences)—that is central to their, and your inquiry—is that ‘all bioenergy technologies—even biomass power compared to natural gas electric—look favorable when biomass waste wood is compared to fossil fuel alternatives.’ 

“Manomet points out that agricultural crops, residues, plantation trees, urban wood—all important and overwhelmingly the source of most bioenergy feedstocks today—were not the focus of their study as mandated by the commonwealth of Massachusetts. That was unfortunate, because the takeaway—that biomass is dirtier than coal—has been an enormously time-consuming myth to correct among policy makers and the public generally. In short, do not make the same mistake as Massachusetts.

“This panel should undertake an inquiry that is relevant to today’s market. Not one of the case studies covers how almost all grid-connected electricity is produced today—from what we call ‘open-loop’ biomass (meaning residues, not natural forests) from a grid-connected, electricity only facility. 

“The panel’s work will be for naught if it focuses, like what Massachusetts asked Manomet to do, on a practice that isn’t done in the industry today to any large degree (i.e., natural forests for energy) or is preoccupied with making pyrolysis and biochar—a business that may have potential but has not yet been fully commercialized.

“Second, make it simple. With that, I thank you for your work, and welcome the opportunity to follow your deliberations.”

 

 

2 Responses

  1. Scott wesley

    2011-11-04

    1

    I believe we can help with your show and would like to look seriously at the cost of a booth! We represent a bio source system, developed overseas, that has a world wide patent, and can eliminate fly ash / coal ash, even garbage, animal waste, sludge, and petroleum waste, while capturing Co2 and producing 3 renewable energy sources. Our technology can thermal chemically process, the fly ash, (or waste) and convert it to electricity, oxygen, and methanol and we have proven this since 2003. All this with ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS! So, to the opponents of bio-mass plants, and claims of them being dirtier, we hold our collected data, proudly against coal, natural gas, or all energy generation plants. Our first plant was erected in Serbia in 2003 to help the government there recover from the ravishes of war and NATO bombing. There, it was able to produce the three sources mentioned above, with the electricity funneled back into the grid, and the methanol used to fuel their stoves, heat their homes, and utilize for their automobiles and trucks. We have recently sold a system to Saudi Arabia for the use of petroleum waste and they have plans to build a 2 GW plant to produce millions and millions of gallons of methanol from the waste. A 20 MW system produces 24 million gallons of methanol on an 8 hour 5 day work week. Price of methanol currently is about $1.36 per gallon. Our thoughts are to have the methanol integrated with gasoline and chemically restructured to meet the oil demands of the future. Yet, our system also produces quite a bit of ELECTRICITY WHICH CAN BE FUNNELED INTO YOUR GRID, oxygen too. FYI ~ Our system is a prefab system that can be transported by train, or flat bed truck and it consists of 4 cells. These cells filter PMs, NOx, SOx, and Co2 and convert to methanol by filtering in steam to take the syngas and reform it to produce methanol. All in all, we can create jobs, eliminate fly ash ~ coal ash, lower or eliminate Co2 emissions, capture without burying in the ground the Co2 from your stacks and convert to three renewable energy sources. These sources will then produce tremendous revenue streams for the electric company! We will also provide scientific and engineering backup to our system and can demonstrate models in Europe or visit a proposed site in the USA, if your organization is interested in this wonderful concept. Also, please feel free to visit us on Facebook at : http://www.facebook.com/mpbiomass Scott Wesley Principal / MP BioMass

  2. Elan

    2011-11-01

    2

    Dear Ms/Mr, Hi there good Evening, Well i'm MR.Elan from Malaysia would like to introduce myself which we are 1 of Pellet producer in Malaysia. If anyone interest please kindly reply my mail. Our test report shown the calorie value are 4500++. If any futher details please kindly call to +6016 401 3668 or mail to elan_113@hotmail.com Thanks, Elan

  3.  

    Leave a Reply

    Biomass Magazine encourages civil conversation and debate. However, comments containing personal attacks, profanity, business solicitations or other advertising will be deleted.

    Comments are closed