66,000 More U.S. Homes Using Wood Heat in 2014

By Anna Simet | December 13, 2013

This week, the U.S. EIA released the December issue of its Short-Term Energy Outlook, and in it there is some good news for wood heat.

Among predictions that biomass heat, power and wood consumption is expected to grow across the board, EIA says this winter, about 2.648 million homes will rely on wood as a primary heating fuel, up 2.5 percent from last winter.

That’s an increase of 66,000 homes.

According to the U.S. Census, the average household consists of 2.6 people, so that’s roughly 171,600 new people enjoying the benefits of residential wood heating.

Breaking the numbers down by region, the western U.S. experienced a 1.1 percent increase with 750,000 homes using wood as a primary heating fuel. In the South, that number went up by three percent from last winter. The Midwest stayed about the same.

The Northeast, however, experienced the most growth—a 6.6 percent increase from last winter, at 632,000 homes.

This is likely the result of a number of things, but I’m confident it has a lot to do with the voices of the northeastern wood heat advocates—trade associations, equipment manufacturers, fuel providers, etc.—that have worked tirelessly over the past several years to draw the public’s and policymakers’ attention to the incredible benefits of residential wood heating. I’ve been on the ground to witness it, most recently at the Wood Stove Decathalon in Washington, D.C.

While 66,000 doesn’t seem like an incredible number compared to the vast number of homes still using fossil fuels as a primary heating source—FutureMetrics recently reported that in the rural Northeast alone, 6 million homes currently utilize oil or propane for heating—it is a definite indicator of positive growth, and I look forward to seeing that momentum continue. 



1 Responses

  1. Jeremy



    Well, perhaps when the solid fuel banning natural gas sponsored researchers and Clean Air lobbies get their successes in destroying coal production completely, increase the spending power of the fossil fuel clean energy offset branding with their world bank backing - maybe then the left-overs of that regime will quit picking on domestic heating and apply their flaky endangerment finding's general toxin group 'ultrafine particulate' to the spin bin. Naturally those who could benefit from EPA legislation have made it work for them. Their propaganda got to wood burners and the few that used catalysts. A test was made to pass those and no others. Winter atmosphere affects the exhaust, creating flue back-pressure. This affects the quality of the combustion and they don't include it in their scientific assessments - only their labels, their stoves, their catalysts, their market. A market that rather than integrating with one without all their rules, chooses to have its own in competition. Quality will improve without their rules and with proper engineers and scientists do the work, not futures propagandists. Going after the wood heating method, rather than just the smoke from it is nothing more than market fixing their own second rate products to it rather than any others available on the free market which may, since they have been better scientifically assessed,independently and without vested special interest, actually fix the issue far more efficiently, effectively and economically FOR THE CONSUMER.


    Leave a Reply

    Biomass Magazine encourages encourages civil conversation and debate. However, we reserve the right to delete comments for reasons including but not limited to: any type of attack, injurious statements, profanity, business solicitations or other advertising.

    Comments are closed